CardConduct
Seller record entry

@thundervaulttcg

Seller entry
TikTok ShopPokemonFirst reported 2026-08-241 report on file
Reported

Reported for: Shill bidding

Evidence received and reviewed. Not yet contested.

Download the full report (PDF)Every public finding, the audit log, and the evidence, laid out as a PDF.
This is a report, not a verdict. Everything below describes public selling conduct attached to a public handle, shown with the evidence it rests on so you can judge it yourself. It is not an allegation that anyone committed a crime. Nothing is published without an investigation, normally over the 3 to 5 days after a report. Where an entry was published faster because the findings were conclusive, the audit log below says so and gives the actual number of days. The seller can dispute it at any time.
This entry is about a handle acting as a seller. Someone selling cards. Reports here are about how they sell. It says nothing about how the same account behaves in the other role, and this record never combines the two into one history.

Audit log (1 report on file)

  1. ReportReported for: Shill bidding

    Supported by the reporter evidence and by material held behind login. This entry is a report, not a verdict.

    Screenshot 1 of 5 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 2 of 5 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 3 of 5 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 4 of 5 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 5 of 5 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 report
  2. Note

    Published sooner than the usual 3 to 5 days because the report arrived with supporting evidence.

What we checked (7 sources)

  • TikTok live VODs and direct-message evidence on file

    This seller was reported for shill bidding on TikTok live auctions. The report describes a recurring top bidder, said to be a family member of the account owner, placing bids that drove up prices on the lots the seller was selling, and states that after the conduct was raised publicly the seller side offered money to have the coverage taken down. Shown here as reported. This is a report, not a verdict.

  • The reported account

    The public TikTok Shop account for this seller.

    Source

  • Follow-up live check, 2026-08-24

    We checked this seller live on TikTok again on 2026-08-24, after this was first reported, and observed the same top bidder back in the number-two position on the live bidder board, consistent with what was reported.

  • Recorded from the seller public TikTok live, 2026-08-24

    On the seller public TikTok live on 2026-08-24, the seller was repeatedly recorded quoting graded PSA 10 dollar values for cards that were being sold raw and ungraded at one-dollar starting bids. Recorded phrasing included "two grand in a PSA 10, $2,000 in a PSA 10" and "thousands in a PSA 10," spoken over cards that had not been graded. A PSA 10 price applies only to a card independently graded gem mint; an ungraded card is not that card. Recorded and shown here so viewers can judge it - a report, not a verdict.

  • Recorded from the seller public TikTok live, 2026-08-24

    On the same 2026-08-24 live, the seller was recorded using investment-return language to drive bids, including "this will be your biggest investment you have ever made" and "3000 percent, it is time to get your investment." Recorded as observed - a report, not a verdict.

  • Recorded from the seller public TikTok live, 2026-08-24

    On the same 2026-08-24 live, the seller was recorded describing current-set and common cards as "grails," for example a "Riolu grail from the brand new mega evolutions ETB" (a current-set pull), with repeated scarcity pressure such as "move on it" and "last copy." Recorded as observed - a report, not a verdict.

  • Recorded from the seller public TikTok live, 2026-08-24

    On the same 2026-08-24 live, the seller offered a raw, ungraded E-reader era Pichu and described it in his own words as "a little LP, a little white on the top," and "the cleanest LP I have ever seen," while anchoring the price to a $2,999 PSA 9 copy he owns. The card was sold raw in a soft sleeve and marked LP on the holder. A card the seller himself describes as Lightly Played with whitening does not grade PSA 10. Recorded as observed - a report, not a verdict.

Is this you?

If this entry is wrong, or it was an honest mistake, say so and it gets re-checked. An explained mistake takes a handle off the record. That grace is one time.

Dispute this listing

Seen the same thing?

Reports add to the audit log on this handle. Include screenshots. We never publish who filed a report, and we do not collect your identity.

File a report

CardConduct identifies sellers by public handle and public selling conduct only. We never publish a person's legal name, address, or private information. Read how entries are investigated.