CardConduct
Seller record entry

@mysticholotcg

Seller entry
TikTok ShopPokemonFirst reported 2026-08-241 report on file
Reported

Reported for: Misrepresented the grade

Evidence received and reviewed. Not yet contested.

Download the full report (PDF)Every public finding, the audit log, and the evidence, laid out as a PDF.
This is a report, not a verdict. Everything below describes public selling conduct attached to a public handle, shown with the evidence it rests on so you can judge it yourself. It is not an allegation that anyone committed a crime. Nothing is published without an investigation, normally over the 3 to 5 days after a report. Where an entry was published faster because the findings were conclusive, the audit log below says so and gives the actual number of days. The seller can dispute it at any time.
This entry is about a handle acting as a seller. Someone selling cards. Reports here are about how they sell. It says nothing about how the same account behaves in the other role, and this record never combines the two into one history.

Audit log (1 report on file)

  1. ReportReported for: Misrepresented the grade

    Supported by the reporter evidence and by material held behind login. This entry is a report, not a verdict.

    Screenshot 1 of 4 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 2 of 4 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 3 of 4 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 reportScreenshot 4 of 4 submitted as evidence for the 2026-08-24 report
  2. Note

    Published sooner than the usual 3 to 5 days because the report arrived with supporting evidence.

What we checked (8 sources)

  • TikTok live VODs and screenshots on file

    This seller was reported for misrepresenting card values, by claiming inflated values and asking prices well above documented comparable sales, including pricing on the basis of a top PSA grade the cards are not guaranteed to receive. Shown here as reported. This is a report, not a verdict.

  • The reported account

    The public TikTok Shop account for this seller.

    Source

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 (captured video + transcript on file)

    On 2026-08-26 the seller ran a live auction of raw (ungraded) Pokemon singles. Prices were anchored to sealed-product/box cost and bids on raw cards were steered toward graded-card value. Viewers who questioned the pricing were removed from the room: a viewer who noted a Charizard was worth about $10 was banned, and immediately after, a viewer who asked what the price of the box has to do with a raw card value was told "I pulled this and I can sell for whatever I want to" and then banned. A two-Charizard lot sold for $17.

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 audio transcript on file

    The seller's own recorded audio from the 2026-08-26 live shows him directing bids on raw cards to graded-card value. On a raw Charizard he said "you have to bid off value, pay it off value, grade this make about 600 bucks" and "get this grade to make some money." He stated he does not grade cards and "sell only raw singles," and dismissed an on-air value question with "what kind of question is that." He also quoted a "$58" gradeable-copy figure while selling the raw card.

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 chat capture on file

    During the 2026-08-26 live, when card values were called out in chat the comments were pushed off-screen by a rapid coordinated flood of messages. A cluster of accounts was observed posting the identical phrase "BEST LIVE WITH HEAT" in unison during the live: RetroTrades.TCG, cirstiboi, dani, Josh Lovely, Paris Jules, godsent8443, and lorenaquintero503. This coordinated flooding is consistent with undisclosed moderators burying value call-outs before other viewers can read them.

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 chat capture on file

    Multiple independent viewers priced the cards during the 2026-08-26 live and called out the markup, for example noting a card was about $10 on TCGplayer, and asked about condition and grading. Buyers in the room are visibly recognizing the gap between the pitched prices and the cards actual market value.

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 cards cross-checked to TCGplayer / PriceCharting / eBay sold

    Cards run in the 2026-08-26 live, checked against current raw (ungraded) market value: Mewtwo Black Star Promo SVP 052 raw ~$47, pitched above $60. Mewtwo-GX Battle Academy stamped promo raw ~$10, pitched $19 as an "insane rare stamp." Mewtwo-GX Shining Legends Rainbow Rare 76/73 raw ~$85-95, pitched as "a $170 card, plus $140-ish." Iron Valiant ex Gold Hyper Rare (Paradox Rift) raw ~$5-6, pitched $12 on a "low population" claim. Blastoise ex and Venusaur ex (SV 151 Double Rares) raw ~$1-4 each, sold in inflated multi-card "lots." Eevee ex Special Illustration Rare 167/131 raw ~$150-185, bundled "four for one." Across the show, raw singles were consistently pitched at graded or above-market prices.

  • TikTok live 2026-08-26 chat capture on file

    At least one of the accounts running the coordinated "BEST LIVE WITH HEAT" flood did more than cheer: the account posting as lorenaquintero503 also engaged in the pricing during the live, naming a card ("Mewtwo GX") and echoing the seller's figure ("140 ish") at the moment the seller was quoting that card at "$140-ish." An undisclosed moderator who also reinforces the seller's asking prices to the room is a shill signal. Whether these accounts also win the lots they hype could not be confirmed from this partial capture and is being checked against the full bid/winner feed.

Is this you?

If this entry is wrong, or it was an honest mistake, say so and it gets re-checked. An explained mistake takes a handle off the record. That grace is one time.

Dispute this listing

Seen the same thing?

Reports add to the audit log on this handle. Include screenshots. We never publish who filed a report, and we do not collect your identity.

File a report

CardConduct identifies sellers by public handle and public selling conduct only. We never publish a person's legal name, address, or private information. Read how entries are investigated.